
Coming into this season, I honestly thought the Athletics would be the laughing stock of the American League, with the exception to the Twins. If you told me that they would be 55-46 by July 30, I would have probably thought you were high on drugs. After selling off a ton of their star players last off-season, Billy Beane (pictured) and Co. pretty much wanted to get their young players some exposure to the big leagues in order to start the rebuilding process. Little did they know, trading away their big name players was probably the best thing they could have done.
Trading Gio Gonzalez and Trevor Cahill brought in some nice pitching prospects, most of whom are currently contributing at the major league level. Trading Andrew Bailey brought in Josh Reddick, who has been a spark plug for the Athletics offense. They also acquired closer Ryan Cook in the Cahill deal, who has pitched great with Oakland. Once again Billy Beane has found no name players and turned them into star players, for a fraction of the cost. When the Tigers released Brandon Inge earlier, practically no one wanted to even show interest in him because his skills were degrading. Billy Beane realized that he would be a cheap option and could just simply need a change of scenery. He was right, Inge thrived with Oakland over the first few weeks but has cooled down since then.
Anyway, the title of this article is Should the A's buy or sell? Honestly, I'm a very conservative fan. If my team is doing bad at the deadline, I would want them to trade some players to acquire some prospects that can help the following year. This situation with Oakland, however, is different. The Athletics actually have a shot this year, and I think that they should make some trades. Should they give up top prospects? Absolutely not. Billy Beane's Moneyball approach can only take his team so far, and he is going to have to bring in a good bat or two eventually. Doing that with a small market team without giving up top prospects is a difficult task, but I think he is capable of getting some deals done.
The Athletics offense has always been a weakness, and they will need to upgrade it. Recently, they acquired catcher George Kottaras from the Brewers which is by no means a blockbuster move, but it is definitely an under the radar move. Kottaras will fit in perfectly with Beane's system, because he draws walks and puts up incredible on base percentages each and every year. A position that should be upgraded is shortstop, because Pennington/Sogard have not been getting the job done. There have been so many reports lately saying that Oakland has been looking at Jays' shortstop Yunel Escobar. While Escobar is a great player in all, that really wouldn't be a good move considering that Toronto's asking price for the young shortstop is very high. They have also looked into acquiring Jimmy Rollins, and supposedly he won't cost a top prospect if Oakland covers most, if not all, of his remaining salary on his contract. That would kill Oakland, because like I said before they are a small market team, so Rollins is pretty much out of the equation. Stephen Drew is a possibility, but the asking price for him is also pretty high, according to several reports.
The starting rotation is full of rookies, and then there's Bartolo Colon. I don't know if Colon and his, large stature, will sustain the final two months of the season. That's why, if I was Billy Beane, I'd be going after a starting pitcher like, perhaps, Dempster? The A's need a veteran presence in that rotation, and Dempster would be a great fit, although a trade to Oakland is highly unlikely.
There are plenty of other positions that Oakland needs to upgrade. They could either choose to lay low at this year's deadline, or they could make a big splash, which is unlikely. Oakland doesn't want to ruin its future and I don't blame them. Overall, Billy Beane has a tough decision to make, but at least its a good decision to be making.